Is the democratic party afraid to say 'no oligarchs' instead of 'no kings' bc so many of the donors paying their leadership and consultants are oligarchs?
This entry was edited (18 hours ago)
Lorraine Lee likes this.
Lorraine Lee reshared this.
Disisdeguey🔻PalestineAction🇵🇸
in reply to she hacked you • • •Lorraine Lee
in reply to she hacked you • •The belief that money is evil can cost people opportunities. Dog only knows how much opportunity it's cost me. Even setting aside opportunities to earn money (which of course can't be set aside entirely), you also won't get the opportunities to work as part of a team, to be challenged by projects larger than hobby scale, to be a contributor, etc., if you don't demonstrate willingness to be money motivated. At least I never found such an end run.
Likewise with politics. Moderates love to point out that victory is a prerequisite for policymaking. Money happens to be a prerequisite for winning. Everyone wants money out of politics, but nobody's in a hurry to run a zero budget campaign. That would be unilateral disarmament.
For what it's worth, I'd rather live in a constrained monarchy (such as Sweden) than an unconstrained oligarchy (such as Russia).
My main complaint with "no kings" as our most prominent slogan is that I'd prefer something more directly insulting to the political right.
Andy Wootton
in reply to she hacked you • • •Video Processing Wiki
in reply to she hacked you • • •Lorraine Lee likes this.
Lorraine Lee reshared this.
Kid Mania
in reply to she hacked you • • •"Is the democratic party afraid to say 'no oligarchs' instead of 'no kings' bc so many of the donors paying their leadership and consultants are oligarchs?"
Yes.
Lorraine Lee likes this.
Lorraine Lee reshared this.